ChatGPT and the Future of Scholarly Communication in Indonesia: A Disruptive Innovation?
Keywords:
ChatGPT, Scholarly Communication, disruptive innovationAbstract
ChatGPT, a GPT-based chatbot, has the potential to revolutionize scholarly communication by automating the process of literature search, citation, and even manuscript writing. This paper aims to explore the potential of ChatGPt in the context of scholarly communications in Indonesia. This study is qualitative research with a case study approach. We first describe the concept and functionality of chatGPT and its potential to disrupt the traditional scholarly citation process. Then, we discuss the potential implications and challenges that need to be addressed for its successful adoption. We then discuss the implications of ChatGPT for scholarly communication in Indonesia: There are several implications that need to be addressed: Increased efficiency in research: ChatGT can process large volumes of data in a matter of minutes, thereby making research more efficient..
References
T. B. Brown et al., “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners.” arXiv, Jul. 22, 2020. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, and I. Sutskever, “Language Models are Unsupervised Multitask Learners,” Open AI Blog, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 9, 2019.
F. Salager-Meyer, “Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future,” J. Engl. Acad. Purp., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 121–132, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009.
L. Nurdin and S. Mukhlis, “Institutional repository as an information infrastructure for scholarly communication: An exploratory study in Indonesia,” Malays. J. Libr. Inf. Sci., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 101–114, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.22452/mjlis.vol24no3.6.
B. Lund, I. Omame, S. Tijani, and D. Agbaji, “Perceptions toward Artificial Intelligence among Academic Library Employees and Alignment with the Diffusion of Innovations’ Adopter Categories,” Coll. Res. Libr., p. 865, 2020, doi: 10.5860/crl.81.5.865.
M. Liebrenz, R. Schleifer, A. Buadze, D. Bhugra, and A. Smith, “Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing,” Lancet Digit. Health, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. e105–e106, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5.
E. George, “ChatGPT and authorship in research: What top publishers are saying,” Researcher.Life Blog, Feb. 17, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://researcher.life/blog/article/chatgpt-and-authorship-in-research/
Published
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhamad Ratodi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
